"Under congress rule in Delhi more than 5000 Sikhs were killed in 1984. This mass killing was termed as unfortunate mob violence by Congress .The attitude wasn’t different when thousands of Kashmiri Pundits’ were tortured, raped and killed by Muslims extremist in Jammu and Kashmir.

Tehelka, the Christian funded media, was readily available in service for Congress and its supremo Sonia to defame their political rivals.The hasty move to air a less credible video on TV channels when Gujarat is going for assembly election in December tells a different story.

The so called secular intellectuals and communist historians played an important role in suppressing the real Indian History before British invasion. Hindu genocides of around 50 million to 60 million Hindus by Muslim rulers over a span of 1000 years of invasion was concealed from Indians in the name of religious harmony!

They advocated that the facts on Hindu persecution would destroy the religious harmony of Independent India. If this communist ideology makes any sense why they are airing a fake video and plea only for Muslims in Gujarat riots. Have U.P.A redefined ‘secularism’ as selective appeasement and selective rationalism.

The crux of this political hoax is-

If a Sikh gets killed it is secular,

If a Kashmir Pundit gets exterminated from their home land it is secularism,

If a Hindu gets slaughtered it is again secular,

BUT WHEN A MUSLIM GETS KILLED IT IS COMMUNAL."

[www.haindavakeralam.org]

If a Sikh gets killed it is secular,

If a Kashmir Pundit gets exterminated from their home land it is secularism,

If a Hindu gets slaughtered it is again secular,

BUT WHEN A MUSLIM GETS KILLED IT IS COMMUNAL.

But the way I see it, in every case an innocent is killed.

"But the way I see it, in every case an innocent is killed"

Exactly my point. Then why killing sikhs is not a holocaust and covering it up is perfectly acceptable?. In both the cases aggressors were Hindus(communal type and secular type) only difference i see is that in one case victims were Muslims while in other case victims were Sikhs.

"A new book on the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in Delhi claims that the Ranganath Misra Commission which probed the carnage presented a "diluted" version of events and also blames the police for the mass killings."

[www.rediff.com]

A Gurmukh’s heart is full of compassion. A sufferer or a victim is not of any religion. Gurmukhs don’t distinguish between victims. Whenever the blood of an innocent is shed, a Gurmukh’s heart is filled with compassion. Siri Guru Nanak Dev jee described the cruelties of Mughals under the command of Babur, in detail and while describing the victims he mentioned all of them including Musalmaaniya (Muslim women), Hindwaaniyaa (Hindu women) and men and women of royalty. He felt compassion for all of them and called Babur a “Jaabur” (cruel aggressor).

Bhai Ghaniya jee when feeding water to injured and tired soldiers in the battles between Khalsa and Muslims, did not distinguish whether he was feeding water to a Hindu or a Sikh or a Muslim. He gave it all, free of any bias.

Same way, we should have compassion for all victims of riots whether in Muslims in Bosnia, Hindus and Sikhs in Afghanistan, Muslims in Godhra, Sikhs in Delhi and Kanpur, Hindus in Punjab during the 80s etc. An innocent victim deserves compassion no matter what the background of the victim.

Kulbir Singh